본문 The bill passed on : Apr. 2011 Began enforcing on : Nov. 2011
Criticism on effectiveness
How can we explain the decision-making process?
Two faces of Power want to solve conflict non-decision making
: restricting the range of decision-making by ma- nipulating social values and procedure
Fery said To prove non-decision making in policy, find individual or organizational fail to attempt on selection and intervention of issues.
Research Question Why the bill was forced to be adopted, despite the criticism on its effectiveness?
Proposition Non-decision making
Research Method & Frame 1. Study literature materials 2. Conducting interviews with Assemblyman
“I can say the bill is slightly harsh in terms of constitutional value(prohibiting excessive restriction).
I am skeptical that this kind of restriction will be effective in the long term.”
-Jin, Seongho. A newspaper interview. 11.05.13
not effective!but symbolic!
The bill cannot be applied to services outside of the country
이춘석, Legislation Committee, 10.4.27
Children are dying because of games, at this moment of discussion
최영희, Main assembly session, 11.4.29
Because youth’s level of happiness is at the bottom of OECD, ‘shut-down rule’ have to be enforced
Non-decision making → partially applicable
Considering these examples which shows the exercise of power and mobilization of biases about games.
Weak theoretical connection unable to prove gov.–media connection failed to get answers of the interview
Suggestion
proper research method Participant observation of related officials ∵ further approach to inside materials
본문내용 Research Design Analysis Conclusion Contents
Introduction Literature Design Introduction of study Analysis Conclusion The bill passed on : Apr. 2011 Began enforcing on : Nov. 2011 Criticism on effectiveness How can we explain the decision-making process?
Introduction Literature Design Shut-down rule: Details Analysis Conclusion To prevent ‘game addiction‘ 16 00:00~06:00
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기